Platform / The governance core
The risk register
The registers we have worked in held the score and not the reasoning, so when the board asked why a risk had moved, the answer had to come from somebody's memory.
Drawn from the platform.
What changes
Every risk carries its owner, its appetite and the reasoning behind both, and the platform works out the score, so nobody types one in. When the board asks why a number moved, the answer is on the record.
Causes and consequences come from a shared list (so a cause is recorded the same way each time), which means a cause can be counted across the whole register and compared.
In detail
The register has two levels, categories and the risks beneath them. Every risk carries an inherent and a residual position across likelihood and impact, and the score is computed (a typed score is how errant figures get in). Eight impact dimensions are available and all are optional, so a framework that scores on three does not carry five empty columns.
Each risk records a named owner, an appetite position with its reasoning and a cause and consequence structure through bow-tie analysis. Causes draw on a shared library you control, so the same cause is counted across the register and is not typed five different ways. Risk events (incidents and near misses) are recorded against the risk they belong to, and not in a separate list that nobody reconciles.
The evidence it leaves behind
Every change to a risk writes an audit entry (who, what changed, from what to what, when and in what role), and nothing edits or deletes it. How the record is protected